Readiness for extubation
Readiness for ward discharge
Readiness for ward discharge
Suitability
- Confirm no longer requires ICU-level therapies or monitoring
- Trajectory towards improvement
- Ward capacity to manage things like pacing, ICC, NIV
- Time of day appropriate
Logistics
- Ensure referrals are in place
- Rationalise IV access, consider PICC
- Go through drug chart and cross off ICU-only meds
- Call home team to handover
- Arrange ICU outreach nurse follow-up
- Consensus about whether patient would be for readmission to ICU if required
Coma
Respiratory failure
Fever
Shock
Renal failure
Jaundice
Abdominal catastrophe
Weakness
Liver failure
Coma
DDx — Coma
- Meningism: SAH, meningitis
- Focal signs: stroke (ischaemic/haemorrhagic), abscess, tumour, cerebral vasculitis, pre-existing neurology with new superimposed coma
- No focal signs: Delirium/Drugs/Seizure, Sugar/Salt/Temperature, BEWITCH (Brainstem stroke with RAS damage, Encephalopathy — septic/hepatic/uraemic, Wernicke's, Ischaemia — hypoxaemia/HIE/diffuse vasculitis, Trauma — concussion/DAI, CO₂, Hypothyroid/hypoadrenalism)
Weakness
Neuropathy vs Myopathy
| Feature |
Neuropathy |
Myopathy |
| Pattern | Uniform or distal | Proximal > distal |
| Sensation | May be affected | Usually normal |
| Reflexes | Lost early | Preserved till late |
| Fasciculations | Can be present | Not typical |
| Contractures | Can be present | Absent |
| CK | Normal | Elevated |
The CICM Part 2 hot case gives you 10 minutes at the bedside and 10 minutes to present. In that time you need to absorb a stem, survey the room, read the monitor, interpret the ventilator, examine the patient, synthesise everything you've found, and deliver a structured presentation that sounds like a consultant ward round.
People will tell you this is what you do every day. It isn't. On a ward round you've pre-read the notes. You've had a handover. You integrate information over hours, not minutes. The hot case asks you to go from zero to a polished, integrated assessment of a complex patient in 10 minutes flat. That is not a normal ward round.
By this stage of training, you know the differential diagnosis for shock. You know the components of an extubation assessment. The knowledge is there. The challenge is accessing it, organising it, and delivering it clearly while your working memory is completely jammed — while you're running on adrenaline after a year of preparation, under the gaze of two examiners, in an unfamiliar unit, with a patient you've never met.
Under those conditions, your functional working memory narrows dramatically. The hot case asks you to use far more of it than you have. The standard advice is to start early and do as many hot cases as possible. Practice matters — but undirected repetition isn't enough. What matters more is deliberate preparation: recognising that the fundamental problem is cognitive overload, and then systematically building structures that address it before you walk into the room.
The approach I used — and the one documented in the guide above — is chunking. Every repeated element of the hot case gets pre-packaged into a single retrievable unit, rehearsed until it's automatic. When I saw a tracheostomy during the walkaround, I didn't think through what to check from first principles. I loaded a pre-built block: surgical or percutaneous, wound site, cuff up or down, secretions above and below. One slot, not five.
The same thinking applies everywhere you can find cognitive slack. Take the infusion pumps: rather than hunting for every pump, reading the labels, converting doses, and mentally sorting them into categories, ask the examiner. They'll read them in category order — sedation, then vasopressors, then everything else. The finding, reading, converting, and sorting is done for you. You just listen and interpret. It's a small example, but the principle scales: identify every point where you're spending working memory on structure rather than reasoning, and find a way to offload it.
The presentation structure works the same way. If your opening sentence, your system-by-system format, and your issues list framework are rehearsed to the point of automaticity, they cost you almost nothing cognitively. Your working memory stays free for the thing the examiners actually want to see: clinical reasoning about this specific patient.
This is the same design principle behind every tool in the Critical Condition portfolio. Offload the structure. Protect working memory. Keep your brainspace free for the decisions that matter.
The guide above is the system I built for myself. It won't teach you the content of intensive care medicine. It's a cognitive architecture for deploying what you already know under pressure.